For in-house legal

Clear the routine queue without giving up the audit trail — and get your time back for the contracts that actually carry risk.

The problem is rarely the hard contracts. It is that the hard ones are buried in a queue of NDAs and order forms that are almost entirely standard, and there is no reliable way to tell which is which without reading each one from the top.

What changes

It measures against your standards, not generic ones

An AI opinion about whether a liability cap is "reasonable" is close to worthless — it depends entirely on whose paper it is and what your business will tolerate. AeroSpark reviews against the policy you configure. Upload your existing negotiation playbook and it becomes the standard every review runs against.

A human decides everything

There is no auto-approval, deliberately. AI does the reading, extraction, comparison and the first draft of the markup. It does not approve contracts. Speed comes from a reviewer being well-briefed, not from nobody looking.


See document review, AI redlining, or how your documents are handled.

Common questions

Does it replace a lawyer?

No. It does the reading, the extraction and the first draft of the markup so that a reviewer arrives briefed. It does not approve contracts and does not give legal advice.

How does it know our positions?

You configure them — governing law, term, liability and so on — or upload an existing negotiation playbook and AeroSpark turns it into a policy you can edit. Uploading your standard NDA also seeds the policy from your own paper.